<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry goes 3G</title>
	<link>http://www.mobileherald.com/blackberry-goes-3g/</link>
	<description>Mobile news that matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileherald.com/blackberry-goes-3g/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobileherald.com/blackberry-goes-3g/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I don't think so. At this point, the operative word is &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt;. But with 3G, a camera sure would be cool to have (for videoconferencing, I mean).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. At this point, the operative word is <em>might</em>. But with 3G, a camera sure would be cool to have (for videoconferencing, I mean).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileherald.com/blackberry-goes-3g/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobileherald.com/blackberry-goes-3g/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>(call me ignorant) but, is that a camera-enabled blackberry?  *shudders* perish the thought.  not having a camera is one of the things i value about my 8700c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(call me ignorant) but, is that a camera-enabled blackberry?  *shudders* perish the thought.  not having a camera is one of the things i value about my 8700c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
